华硕Zenfone 9评测-世界杯中国巴西-世界杯奖金_2018世界杯闭幕式

华硕Zenfone 9评测--轻巧的5G智能手机几乎没有任何替代物，其尺寸紧凑小而不倒？华硕Zenfone 9以其紧凑的设计而特别吸引人。同时，这款华硕智能手机还提供了非常强大的硬件，包括骁龙8+一代，16GB内存，以及万向节主摄像头。请在我们的评论中了解，购买这款轻型智能手机是否值得。Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/14/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

🇸🇪 🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇵🇱 5G Smartphone Android Touchscreen

4 Reviews ← exclude selected types

对于那些喜欢紧凑型智能手机的人，华硕今年也提供了一个合适的伴侣。正如已经推出的禅风8这家台湾制造商继续使用5.9英寸AMOLED面板，分辨率为1080像素。然而，Zenfone 9显示屏的刷新率已经提高到120赫兹，屏幕与机身的比例也变得稍微有效。

随着骁龙8+第一代，这款高端智能手机的紧凑外壳内有一个旗舰级SoC，伴随着高达16GB的LPDDR5-RAM和最大256GB的UFS 3.1存储。Zenfone 9的基本版本从8GB内存和128GB存储开始，建议零售价为799欧元（约合人民币801元），而配备16GB内存和256GB存储的顶级型号价格为899欧元（约合人民币901元）。

在背面，两个大的相机镜头很突出。主摄像头提供了一个来自索尼的5000万像素的传感器，它在六个轴上用万向节OIS系统进行稳定。

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Zenfone 9 (Zenfone Series)ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) WaipioGraphics adapterQualcomm Adreno 730Memory16 GB , LPDDR5Display5.90 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 446 PPI, capacitive touchscreen , AMOLED , glossy: yes, HDR, 120 HzStorage256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB , 218 GB freeConnections1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo audio port, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, OTG, MiracastNetworking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n28/n38/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 9.1 x 146.5 x 68.1Battery4300 mAh Lithium-IonChargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 12CameraPrimary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.9, OIS) + 12 MP (f/2.2, wide angle lens), camera2API: Level 3Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.45)Additional featuresSpeakers: Stereo , Keyboard: onscreen, USB power adapter, USB cable, phone case, SIM tool, ZenUI, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, fanless, waterproofWeight169 g, Power Supply: 108 g

Price899 EuroLinksAsus homepageAsus notebook sectionNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

潜在的竞争对手比较

RatingDateModelWeightDriveSizeResolutionPrice

88.6 %v7 (old)09 / 2022Asus Zenfone 9SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730169 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash5.90"2400x1080

87.7 %v7 (old)03 / 2022Xiaomi 12SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730179 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.28"2400x1080

89.3 %v7 (old)05 / 2022Samsung Galaxy S22Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920167 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2340x1080

87 %v7 (old)08 / 2022OnePlus 10TSD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730203.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2412x1080

85.6 %v7 (old)07 / 2022Nothing Phone (1)SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L193.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080

85.9 %v7 (old)05 / 2021Asus ZenFone 8SD 888 5G, Adreno 660169 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash5.92"2400x1080

外壳 - 华硕智能手机，有一个冲孔

Zenfone 9仅重169克（约6盎司），尺寸为146.5 x 68.1 x 9.1毫米（约5.76 x 2.68 x 0.36英寸），比Zenfone 8略小一些。禅峰8在所有尺寸上都要小一点。与大多数高端产品的代表相比，如一加10T，华硕智能手机的结构非常紧凑，方便小巧。

对于背面，华硕使用了一种新开发的结构化表面材料，据制造商称，这种材料应该是非常有弹性的。这种材料有月光白、星空蓝、夕阳红和午夜黑四种颜色，感觉有点像麂皮，不会出现很多指纹。然而，在我们看来，与玻璃或陶瓷材料相比，你可以对质量印象和触觉有不同的看法。此外，该表面很难清洁。

华硕智能手机的正面是由防刮擦的大猩猩玻璃Victus显示玻璃制成，它均匀地过渡到金属框架。前面的表面与显示屏的比率是坚实的84%。对于我们的口味来说，显示屏的边框可以变得更小，虽然。与较大的竞争对手相比，如小米12超过89%，Zenfone 9在这方面显然被超越了。

和它的前辈一样，Zenfone 9也提供了符合IP68标准的官方IP认证，对灰尘和水提供了一定的保护。考虑到高质量的做工，这款高端智能手机的整体印象让人没有理由抱怨。

尺寸比较

OnePlus 10T Nothing Phone (1) Xiaomi 12 Asus ZenFone 8 Asus Zenfone 9 Samsung Galaxy S22 DIN A6 ❌

设备 - 带有3.5毫米音频接口的Zenfone 9在设备方面，Zenfone 9提供了一个双扬声器系统，蓝牙5.2，一个用于非接触式支付的NFC芯片，以及一个3.5毫米的音频接口。我们测试的带有256GB UFS存储的顶级版本为用户提供了218GB的可用空间。此外，还有双SIM卡功能，但与前代产品一样，卡盘不接受microSD卡。

另一方面，你可以通过USB-C端口将存储媒体等外部外围设备连接到华硕智能手机上。但不幸的是，这仍然只支持2.0标准。它不仅明显慢于 Galaxy S22的速度，而且它也不支持有线显示输出。

左手边的箱子

右侧外壳（开/关键和音量摇杆）

底部（扬声器、USB接口、麦克风、SIM卡插槽）

顶部（3.5毫米音频端口，麦克风）软件--华硕智能手机与Android 12除了紧凑的尺寸，华硕在软件方面也专注于最佳的单手操作。基于Android 12的ZenUI-9用户界面在侧面提供了一个可配置的边缘工具，提供舒适的快速访问应用程序。

在我们测试的时候，我们测试装置上的安全补丁是2022年8月的水平。在智能手机推出后的前两年应该只有更新，所以直到2024年。

通信和GNSS - 华硕Zenfone 9配备5G功能在家里的无线局域网内，Zenfone 9提供了快速的802.11ax标准与Wi-Fi 6E，确保在我们的测量中具有非常高的传输速率。然而，结合我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器，6-GHz频段并不被认可。另一方面，华硕智能手机在5-GHz频率范围内也达到了快速的900 Mbit/s。此外，这些数值非常稳定。

除了快速的WLAN，Zenfone 9还使用5G标准，但不支持毫米波。此外，这款小巧的高端智能手机提供了总共20个LTE频段的接入，包括第28频段在内的所有与德语国家相关的LTE频率都被覆盖。

NetworkingAsus Zenfone 9Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash iperf3 receive AXE11000

919 (min: 892) MBit/s ∼98%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000

938 (min: 470) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1715 (min: 801) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1602 (min: 797) MBit/s ∼91%

Xiaomi 12Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash iperf3 receive AXE11000

854 (min: 763) MBit/s ∼91%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000

757 (min: 380) MBit/s ∼81%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1407 (min: 872) MBit/s ∼82%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1751 (min: 879) MBit/s ∼100%

Samsung Galaxy S22Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash iperf3 receive AXE11000

763 (min: 386) MBit/s ∼82%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000

823 (min: 418) MBit/s ∼88%

OnePlus 10TAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash iperf3 receive AXE11000

934 (min: 768) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000

933 (min: 865) MBit/s ∼99%

Nothing Phone (1)Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

946 (min: 926) MBit/s ∼55%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

598 (min: 517) MBit/s ∼34%

Asus ZenFone 8Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash iperf3 transmit AX12

1261 (min: 1192) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AX12

903 (min: 446) MBit/s ∼100%

Average of class Smartphone iperf3 receive AXE11000

717 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼77%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000

720 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼77%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1418 (min: 521) MBit/s ∼83%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1386 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼79%

Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1689 (801-1773) Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1407 (872-1714) Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1574 (797-1629) Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1722 (879-1776) Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø918 (892-936) Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø854 (763-898) Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø922 (470-957) Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø745 (380-826)

在室内定位

在户外定位为了确定其位置，Zenfone 9使用了GPS（L1+L5）、GLONASS（G1）、BeiDou（B1、B2）和Galileo（E1+E5）卫星系统。为了评估实践中的定位精度，我们带着华硕智能手机进行了一次小规模的骑行，与Garmin Venu 2平行记录路线，进行比较。

Zenfone 9的定位能力基本上是令人信服的。尽管记录的路线有一些小的不准确，但华硕智能手机非常适用于导航任务。在GPS记录的细节中，我们几乎没有注意到与我们选择的路线有任何较大的偏差。

华硕Zenfone 9 vs. Garmin Venu 2

电话功能和语音质量 - 华硕双SIM卡的智能手机Zenfone 9支持两张nano SIM卡以及VoLTE标准和WLAN通话，但没有eSIM。语音质量是不明显的。声音被清晰地再现，我们的对话伙伴也将其描述为非常清晰。有了两个内置的麦克风，华硕智能手机也能在视频会议中得分--通过Skype测试--并有双扬声器系统。

相机 - Zenfone 9采用双摄像头系统用Zenfone 9拍摄的自拍在前面，华硕使用了索尼IMX663，分辨率为12MP。这款带有自动对焦功能的自拍相机提供了舒适的清晰度，色彩对比度丰富，在白天有良好的照明效果。隐藏在冲孔下的摄像头最多能录制UHD质量的视频，与相位检测自动对焦相结合，能产生很好的Vlogging效果。

Zenfone 9的主摄像头是基于IMX766的，这个传感器我们已经知道，因为它被用于许多智能手机，如一加10T或 Nothing Phone 1.在良好的光线条件下，拍摄的照片具有良好的锐度，但边缘略微过度锐化。总的来说，图片的动态效果可以稍微好一点。在弱光条件下，华硕智能手机很快就达到了它的极限。尽管有f/1.9的大光圈，但拍摄出来的照片非常暗，所以只有少数细节保留下来。然而，由于采用了六轴混合云台技术，其清晰度令人满意。

超广角镜头具有113度的相对宽广的视角，提供了一个体面的图像质量，包括一个微距功能。虽然照片的颜色略显苍白，但它们提供了良好的基本锐度和中等水平的细节。由于Zenfone 9没有为长焦镜头提供足够的空间，所以放大的照片只能通过数字方式制作。其结果也相应地较弱。

另一方面，在视频性能方面几乎没有任何妥协。对于这个价位的相机来说，50万像素相机的防抖性能非常好，在白天，大多数运动都可以通过万向节技术得到补偿。此外，专业视频模式允许你手动调整许多参数。然而，你仍然可以看到Zenfone 9在夜间的一些微停顿。除了每秒30帧的UHD记录（3,840 × 2,160），主摄像头还提供8K选项。虽然你可以在拍摄时切换镜头，但在Hyper Steady模式下，这是不可能的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

WeitwinkelWeitwinkelLow LightUltraweitwinkelZoom 5xclick to load imagesAsus Zenfone 9Sony Xperia 1 IVHonor Magic 4 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesAsus Zenfone 9Sony Xperia 1 IVHonor Magic 4 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesAsus Zenfone 9Sony Xperia 1 IVHonor Magic 4 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesAsus Zenfone 9Sony Xperia 1 IVHonor Magic 4 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesAsus Zenfone 9Sony Xperia 1 IVHonor Magic 4 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x

我们分析了50万像素镜头在受控光线条件下的色彩再现，并与实际参考色彩进行对比。除了智能手机典型的增亮外，Zenfone 9在ColorChecker护照上显示出相对较低的偏差。这款华硕智能手机在色彩准确性方面完全没有显示出任何高的异常值（>15）。另一方面，白平衡可以做得更好。

6.5 ∆E3.3 ∆E5.3 ∆E11.6 ∆E4.7 ∆E3.6 ∆E4.3 ∆E4 ∆E5.5 ∆E5.5 ∆E5 ∆E4.1 ∆E4.5 ∆E8.9 ∆E7.1 ∆E2.8 ∆E4.8 ∆E9.7 ∆E9.4 ∆E3.7 ∆E3.3 ∆E4.3 ∆E1.7 ∆E2 ∆EColorChecker Asus Zenfone 9: 5.23 ∆E min: 1.69 - max: 11.61 ∆E19.8 ∆E23.2 ∆E21.6 ∆E22.3 ∆E24.9 ∆E34.4 ∆E25.2 ∆E16.2 ∆E15.7 ∆E17.3 ∆E29.3 ∆E32.6 ∆E15.6 ∆E25 ∆E10.9 ∆E23 ∆E19.3 ∆E25.7 ∆E22.1 ∆E22 ∆E24.4 ∆E25.1 ∆E21 ∆E12.9 ∆EColorChecker Asus Zenfone 9: 22.06 ∆E min: 10.88 - max: 34.35 ∆E

Asus Zenfone 9Asus Zenfone 9

配件和保修 - 华硕Zenfone 9带充电器Zenfone 9随附的充电器是。Zenfone 9还包括一个30瓦的模块化充电器、数据/充电线（USB-C到USB-C）、保护罩、SIM卡工具、快速入门手册以及保修说明。

另外，制造商还提供了一个特殊的模块化Connex外壳系统（建议零售价：50欧元，约合50美元），除了保护功能外，还提供了一个用于背包的连接系统和一个Connex卡座，以保存您的身份证或信用卡。

华硕在德国为其智能手机提供24个月的保修。

输入设备和操作 - 带有FaceUnlock的华硕智能手机5.9英寸OLED显示屏上的输入被准确识别，直到触摸屏的角落。凭借其240赫兹的扫描速率，Zenfone 9面板每秒最多检查240次触摸输入，例如在游戏时，确保触摸输入的低延迟性。

除了紧凑的尺寸外，华硕智能手机的单手操作还得益于背面的ZenTouch多功能键和手势控制。例如，后者可以通过双击背部启动手电筒功能来触发。右侧外壳上的中央按键元件不仅可以识别指纹以解锁显示屏，还可以提供手势控制，例如，打开通知栏或控制媒体播放器。

电源键上的集成光学指纹传感器可以非常可靠地解锁Zenfone 9，而且速度也很快。还有一个相当不安全的2D人脸识别，它是基于通过前置摄像头的FaceUnlock功能。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 华硕的OLED智能手机子像素网格显示Zenfone有一个5.9英寸的AMOLED显示屏，分辨率为2400 x 1,080像素，支持高达120赫兹的刷新率。那些想省点电的人还可以将显示屏配置为使用90赫兹或60赫兹。华硕智能手机还提供了一个自动模式。然而，在我们的测试中，只使用60和90赫兹的刷新率，而不是120赫兹。

在我们的亮度测量中，OLED面板达到了800cd/m²，完全是白色显示，这对于这个价格级别来说是令人满意的。在APL18的测量中，对于日常操作来说更加真实，它在显示屏的中心达到了1070cd/m²。这也是一个很好的价值，但 Galaxy S22仍然可以在1,296 cd/m²的亮度上略胜一筹。

由于采用了OLED面板技术，Zenfone 9使用PWM与其显示屏的闪烁来控制亮度。低于75%的显示亮度，PWM频率在119和478赫兹之间变化。到最大亮度时，振幅会变得更加均匀，并保持在120赫兹。在设置中还有一个直流调光模式（60 Hz）。在我们的时间性抖动测试中，Zenfone 9的行为并不突出。

804cd/m²796cd/m²786cd/m²806cd/m²793cd/m²787cd/m²808cd/m²791cd/m²794cd/m²

Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 808 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 796.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.92 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 97 %Center on Battery: 793 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.85ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.09-98 Ø5.198.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.26

Asus Zenfone 9AMOLED , 2400x1080, 5.9"Xiaomi 12OLED, 2400x1080, 6.3"Samsung Galaxy S22AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.1"OnePlus 10TFluid AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.7"Nothing Phone (1)OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"Asus ZenFone 8AMOLED, 2400x1080, 5.9"Screen4%6%-9%9%-12%Brightness middle793867 9%853 8%861 9%620 -22%758 -4%Brightness796867 9%858 8%856 8%625 -21%759 -5%Brightness Distribution9798 1%96 -1%97 0%98 1%98 1%Black Level *Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.91.7 11%1.9 -0%2.27 -19%1.24 35%3.5 -84%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *3.44.4 -29%3.2 6%4.17 -23%2.31 32%Greyscale dE 2000 *2.31.8 22%1.9 17%2.9 -26%1.7 26%1.6 30%Gamma2.26 97%2.2 100%2.07 106%2.303 96%2.318 95%2.23 99%CCT6860 95%6762 96%6460 101%6141 106%6325 103%6527 100%* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 478 HzThe display backlight flickers at 478 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 478 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8429 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

分钟。

25%

50%

75%

100%在一个固定的变焦水平上的测量系列，有各种亮度设置

▶ load Youtube video

这款高端智能手机提供了4个颜色配置文件和一个 "调整 "模式，你可以调整色温和强度。我们用CalMAN分析软件评估AMOLED面板的色彩校准。

在默认设置中（配置文件：自然），较大的P3色彩空间是目标，也在很大程度上被覆盖。我们测量的DeltaE值显示颜色的偏差非常低（<2）。我们可以在绿色和绿松石色中看到一些最小的差异。灰度的再现也显示出相当低的偏差，保持在目标范围内（<3）。

色彩精度（色彩目标空间：P3；配置文件：自然，最大暖色）。

色彩空间（色彩目标空间：P3；配置文件：自然，最大暖色）。

灰度（色彩目标空间：P3；配置文件：自然，最大暖色）。

饱和度（色彩目标空间：P3；配置文件：自然，最大暖色）。

Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8655 ms rise↘ 0.78 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.6 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey1.65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.828 ms rise↘ 0.8225 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms).

这款高端智能手机显示自己在日常操作中为户外使用提供了非常好的装备。由于高亮度和强大的对比度，即使在阳光直射下，内容始终保持足够的可读性。然而，你应该知道，没有亮度传感器的最大亮度只有446cd/m²，而且基本上应该避免玻璃表面的反射。

由于采用了OLED技术，可视角度的稳定性非常好，我们只注意到在非常陡峭的可视角度下亮度的损失。颜色方面几乎没有任何明显的变化。

性能 - 采用高通SoC的Zenfone 9尽管Zenfone的尺寸很紧凑，但华硕使用了强大的骁龙8+ Gen 1以及16GB的LPDDR5-RAM。在我们的基准测试中，高通SoC提供了非常强大的性能，将竞争对手远远甩在后面。特别是Zenfone 9的多核结果在Geekbench中变得非常高。即使在长时间的负载下，华硕智能手机也没有报告任何过热保护，所有的基准测试都没有中断。

Single-CoreAsus Zenfone 9Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

1322 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (897 - 1389, n=25)

1281 Points -3%OnePlus 10TQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

1277 Points -3%Xiaomi 12Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192

1237 Points -6%Samsung Galaxy S22Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192

1145 Points -13%Asus ZenFone 8Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384

1124 Points -15%Average of class Smartphone (145 - 2437, n=159, last 2 years)

1110 Points -16%Nothing Phone (1)Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192

824 Points -38% Multi-CoreAsus Zenfone 9Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

4436 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3782 - 4436, n=25)

4167 Points -6%OnePlus 10TQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

3987 Points -10%Average of class Smartphone (550 - 8816, n=159, last 2 years)

3756 Points -15%Xiaomi 12Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192

3581 Points -19%Samsung Galaxy S22Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192

3474 Points -22%Asus ZenFone 8Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384

3385 Points -24%Nothing Phone (1)Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192

2998 Points -32%Antutu v9 - Total Score

Asus Zenfone 9Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

1081005 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (782013 - 1119358, n=23)

997431 Points -8%Xiaomi 12Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192

982789 Points -9%OnePlus 10TQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

846323 Points -22%Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 2056989, n=70, last 2 years)

813752 Points -25%Samsung Galaxy S22Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192

813746 Points -25%Asus ZenFone 8Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384

795730 Points -26%Nothing Phone (1)Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192

582264 Points -46%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0

Asus Zenfone 9Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

16528 Points Asus ZenFone 8Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384

16428 Points -1%OnePlus 10TQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

15944 Points -4%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (11029 - 20841, n=24)

15090 Points -9%Xiaomi 12Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192

14508 Points -12%Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 27169, n=192, last 2 years)

14074 Points -15%Samsung Galaxy S22Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192

14068 Points -15%Nothing Phone (1)Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192

11662 Points -29%CrossMark - Overall

Asus Zenfone 9Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

1163 Points Xiaomi 12Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192

1109 Points -5%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (749 - 1178, n=23)

1033 Points -11%Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=153, last 2 years)

1002 Points -14%Samsung Galaxy S22Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192

957 Points -18%OnePlus 10TQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

806 Points -31%Nothing Phone (1)Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192

760 Points -35%BaseMark OS II

OverallOnePlus 10TQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

8320 Points +1%Asus Zenfone 9Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

8273 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (5642 - 8753, n=23)

7450 Points -10%Samsung Galaxy S22Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192

6991 Points -15%Xiaomi 12Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192

6860 Points -17%Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 14066, n=154, last 2 years)

6848 Points -17%Asus ZenFone 8Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384

6043 Points -27%Nothing Phone (1)Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192

4768 Points -42% SystemAsus Zenfone 9Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

12637 Points OnePlus 10TQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

12230 Points -3%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (8750 - 13563, n=23)

11726 Points -7%Samsung Galaxy S22Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192

11210 Points -11%Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 20776, n=154, last 2 years)

10727 Points -15%Nothing Phone (1)Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192

10424 Points -18%Xiaomi 12Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192

10334 Points -18%Asus ZenFone 8Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384

9973 Points -21% MemoryOnePlus 10TQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

8822 Points +7%Asus Zenfone 9Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

8263 Points Average of class Smartphone (962 - 20572, n=154, last 2 years)

7602 Points -8%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3871 - 9114, n=23)

7492 Points -9%Xiaomi 12Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192

6535 Points -21%Samsung Galaxy S22Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192

6413 Points -22%Asus ZenFone 8Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384

6300 Points -24%Nothing Phone (1)Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192

4763 Points -42% GraphicsOnePlus 10TQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

24037 Points +5%Asus Zenfone 9Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

22938 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (16194 - 26660, n=23)

21146 Points -8%Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)

19500 Points -15%Xiaomi 12Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192

18370 Points -20%Samsung Galaxy S22Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192

17269 Points -25%Asus ZenFone 8Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384

13167 Points -43%Nothing Phone (1)Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192

8175 Points -64% WebAsus Zenfone 9Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

1982 Points Samsung Galaxy S22Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192

1924 Points -3%OnePlus 10TQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

1833 Points -8%Xiaomi 12Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192

1785 Points -10%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1198 - 2006, n=23)

1699 Points -14%Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2363, n=154, last 2 years)

1619 Points -18%Asus ZenFone 8Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384

1612 Points -19%Nothing Phone (1)Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192

1273 Points -36%AImark - Score v2.x

Asus Zenfone 9Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

7208 Points OnePlus 10TQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

6955 Points -4%Xiaomi 12Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192

6766 Points -6%Samsung Galaxy S22Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192

6487 Points -10%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1043 - 7865, n=11)

6385 Points -11%Nothing Phone (1)Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192

5823 Points -19%UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI

Asus Zenfone 9Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

82462 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3291 - 84787, n=21)

43831 Points -47%Nothing Phone (1)Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192

20784 Points -75%Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=147, last 2 years)

17698 Points -79%OnePlus 10TQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384

11648 Points -86%

在图形测试中，Zenfone 9也提供了一个强大的性能，它采用了阿德雷诺730，但与一加10T的差异较小，而一些骁龙8代竞争对手甚至最终领先于华硕智能手机。这可能与华硕智能手机明显的节流现象有关。

3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench 3DMark

Wild Life Extreme UnlimitedOnePlus 10TAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

2876 Points +7%Asus Zenfone 9Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

2698 Points Xiaomi 12Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

2418 Points -10%Samsung Galaxy S22Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1855 Points -31%Asus ZenFone 8Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1512 Points -44%Nothing Phone (1)Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

686 Points -75% Wild Life ExtremeOnePlus 10TAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

2824 Points +3%Asus Zenfone 9Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

2754 Points Xiaomi 12Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

2586 Points -6%Samsung Galaxy S22Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1946 Points -29%Asus ZenFone 8Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1528 Points -45%Nothing Phone (1)Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

692 Points -75% Wild Life Unlimited ScoreAsus Zenfone 9Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

11087 Points OnePlus 10TAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

10989 Points -1%Xiaomi 12Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

9782 Points -12%Samsung Galaxy S22Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

7458 Points -33%Asus ZenFone 8Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

5821 Points -47%Nothing Phone (1)Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

2576 Points -77% Wild Life ScoreXiaomi 12Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

9713 Points Samsung Galaxy S22Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

7064 Points Asus ZenFone 8Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

5767 Points Nothing Phone (1)Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

2570 Points GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7

T-Rex OnscreenXiaomi 12Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

121 fps +1%Asus Zenfone 9Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

120 fps Asus ZenFone 8Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

119 fps -1%Samsung Galaxy S22Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

119 fps -1%Nothing Phone (1)Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

113 fps -6%OnePlus 10TAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

60 fps -50%1920x1080 T-Rex OffscreenOnePlus 10TAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

435 fps +14%Xiaomi 12Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

428 fps +12%Asus Zenfone 9Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

381 fps Samsung Galaxy S22Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

302 fps -21%Asus ZenFone 8Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

238 fps -38%Nothing Phone (1)Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

141 fps -63%GFXBench 3.0

on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGLXiaomi 12Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

121 fps +4%Samsung Galaxy S22Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

119 fps +3%Asus ZenFone 8Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

116 fps 0%Asus Zenfone 9Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

116 fps Nothing Phone (1)Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

74 fps -36%OnePlus 10TAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

60 fps -48%1920x1080 1080p Manhattan OffscreenOnePlus 10TAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

221 fps +26%Xiaomi 12Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

213 fps +21%Samsung Galaxy S22Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

193 fps +10%Asus Zenfone 9Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

176 fps Asus ZenFone 8Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

152 fps -14%Nothing Phone (1)Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

82 fps -53%GFXBench 3.1

on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 OnscreenXiaomi 12Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

121 fps +38%Samsung Galaxy S22Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

113 fps +28%Asus ZenFone 8Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

93 fps +6%Asus Zenfone 9Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

88 fps OnePlus 10TAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

60 fps -32%Nothing Phone (1)Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

58 fps -34%1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 OffscreenOnePlus 10TAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

171 fps +50%Xiaomi 12Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

164 fps +44%Samsung Galaxy S22Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

123 fps +8%Asus Zenfone 9Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

114 fps Asus ZenFone 8Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

105 fps -8%Nothing Phone (1)Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

64 fps -44%GFXBench

on screen Car Chase OnscreenXiaomi 12Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

81 fps +5%Asus Zenfone 9Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

77 fps Samsung Galaxy S22Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

60 fps -22%OnePlus 10TAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

60 fps -22%Asus ZenFone 8Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

53 fps -31%Nothing Phone (1)Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

33 fps -57%1920x1080 Car Chase OffscreenOnePlus 10TAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

108 fps +29%Asus Zenfone 9Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

84 fps Xiaomi 12Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

78 fps -7%Samsung Galaxy S22Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

67 fps -20%Asus ZenFone 8Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

61 fps -27%Nothing Phone (1)Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

37 fps -56%on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier OnscreenAsus Zenfone 9Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

86 fps Xiaomi 12Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

69 fps -20%OnePlus 10TAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

59 fps -31%Samsung Galaxy S22Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

51 fps -41%Asus ZenFone 8Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

41 fps -52%Nothing Phone (1)Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

22 fps -74%2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenOnePlus 10TAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

44 fps 0%Asus Zenfone 9Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

44 fps Xiaomi 12Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

39 fps -11%Samsung Galaxy S22Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

29 fps -34%Asus ZenFone 8Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

26 fps -41%Nothing Phone (1)Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

15 fps -66%on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OnscreenAsus Zenfone 9Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

98 fps Xiaomi 12Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

93 fps -5%Samsung Galaxy S22Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

66 fps -33%OnePlus 10TAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

60 fps -39%Asus ZenFone 8Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

57 fps -42%Nothing Phone (1)Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

36 fps -63%1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OffscreenOnePlus 10TAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

123 fps +10%Asus Zenfone 9Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

112 fps Xiaomi 12Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

99 fps -12%Samsung Galaxy S22Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

67 fps -40%Asus ZenFone 8Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

64 fps -43%Nothing Phone (1)Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

40 fps -64%

在日常操作和浏览时，华硕智能手机给人留下了极佳的印象。性能和基准测试结果都是一流的。特别是ZenUI的简短系统动画，使这款高端智能手机显得反应非常迅速。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score

Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)

147.648 Points Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)

138.7 Points -6%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 204, n=23)

125.2 Points -15%Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)

113.8 Points -23%Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)

96.4 Points -35%OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)

81.383 Points -45%Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)

73.679 Points -50%Speedometer 2.0 - Result

Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=143, last 2 years)

170.8 runs/min +67%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69.1 - 196, n=18)

119.6 runs/min +17%Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)

111 runs/min +9%Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)

107 runs/min +5%Asus Zenfone 9

102 runs/min OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)

93.4 runs/min -8%Nothing Phone (1) (Chome 103)

53.71 runs/min -47%WebXPRT 3 - Overall

Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)

168 Points Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=64, last 2 years)

163.1 Points -3%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (106 - 224, n=14)

159.4 Points -5%Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)

149 Points -11%Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)

149 Points -11%Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)

148 Points -12%OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)

106 Points -37%Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)

102 Points -39%Octane V2 - Total Score

Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)

54646 Points Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)

43311 Points -21%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 61536, n=24)

42193 Points -23%OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)

39982 Points -27%Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)

38992 Points -29%Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)

37926 Points -31%Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)

37279 Points -32%Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)

24488 Points -55%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total

Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)

1796.1 ms * -134%OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)

1627.3 ms * -112%Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)

1566 ms * -104%Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)

1397 ms * -82%Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)

1352 ms * -76%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (665 - 1707, n=22)

1023 ms * -33%Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)

930 ms * -21%Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)

768.66 ms * * ... smaller is better

Zenfone 9的256GB UFS存储空间提供了很高的读取和写入速度。近1800Mbit/s的写入速度确实很强大。

Asus Zenfone 9Xiaomi 12Samsung Galaxy S22OnePlus 10TNothing Phone (1)Asus ZenFone 8Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-5-2%-28%-41%-26%-25%-19%-6% Sequential Read 256KB1986.971851 -7%1486 -25%1568.37 -21%1638 -18%1781 -10%1728 ?(950 - 2037, n=106) -13%2061 ?(270 - 4384, n=188, last 2 years) 4% Sequential Write 256KB1776.211417 -20%993 -44%847.69 -52%1351.9 -24%767 -57%1155 ?(166.8 - 2004, n=106) -35%1673 ?(103.2 - 4030, n=188, last 2 years) -6% Random Read 4KB298.46325.2 9%273 -9%173.45 -42%240.6 -19%292.3 -2%285 ?(173.5 - 543, n=106) -5%285 ?(47.6 - 504, n=188, last 2 years) -5% Random Write 4KB398.39437.5 10%257.6 -35%211.24 -47%228.2 -43%272.9 -31%316 ?(62.6 - 499, n=107) -21%326 ?(9.4 - 964, n=188, last 2 years) -18%

游戏--华硕Zenfone 9达到120帧我们使用我们的合作伙伴GameBench的应用程序来评估紧凑型高端智能手机的游戏能力。，也记录了每秒的准确帧率。

PUBG移动版运行良好且流畅。在高清设置下，可以达到60帧，而Zenfone 9在UHD选项下达到稳定的40帧。Armajet的帧率也同样具有吸引力。华硕在这里达到了110帧/秒，这明显超过了小米12或 Galaxy S22.

氩氦刀

PUBG手机版

Asus Zenfone 9; Armajet: Ø93.5 (67-120) Asus Zenfone 9; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.3 (50-61) Asus Zenfone 9; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø59.9 (59-61) Asus Zenfone 9; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (57-61) Asus Zenfone 9; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.8 (35-41)

排放--华硕智能手机只在有限范围内升温温度GFXBench基准测试对于一款搭载骁龙8+ Gen1的智能手机来说，外壳的表面温度相对较低，即使在负载下也是如此。特别是考虑到其紧凑的结构，Zenfone 9产生的热量相对较低，但这也不利于其性能。

这款高端智能手机完成了GFXBench的电池测试，没有任何中断，甚至是苛刻的曼哈顿测试（OpenGL ES 3.1），尽管我们无法评估。 3DMark的Wild Life压力测试也没有任何问题，但高通SoC在这里明显被扼杀。在大约50%的情况下，Zenfone 9的性能明显不如前代产品。另一方面，其他配备骁龙8+ Gen1的智能手机，如小米12S Pro，也有类似的散热问题，也相应地降低了性能。

Max. LoadIdle

35.1 °C35 °C34.2 °C 35.1 °C34.7 °C34.1 °C 33.9 °C34.8 °C33.5 °C

Maximum: 35.1 °CAverage: 34.5 °C

32.2 °C33.2 °C34.7 °C31.5 °C33.6 °C34.6 °C30.2 °C32.8 °C35 °C

Maximum: 35 °CAverage: 33.1 °C Power Supply (max.) 25.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle

28.1 °C28 °C29.1 °C 28.1 °C28.1 °C28.5 °C 27.7 °C28.1 °C28.8 °C

Maximum: 29.1 °CAverage: 28.3 °C

26.9 °C27.4 °C27.2 °C26.7 °C27.5 °C27.5 °C26.6 °C27.1 °C27.6 °C

Maximum: 27.6 °CAverage: 27.2 °C Power Supply (max.) 25.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark

Wild Life Stress Test StabilityNothing Phone (1)Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

99.5 % +87%OnePlus 10TAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

92.7 % +75%Asus ZenFone 8Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

92.3 % +74%Samsung Galaxy S22Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

56.4 % +6%Asus Zenfone 9Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

53.1 % Xiaomi 12Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

46.3 % -13% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestNothing Phone (1)Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

99 % +88%Asus ZenFone 8Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

85.5 % +62%Samsung Galaxy S22Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

56 % +6%Asus Zenfone 9Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

52.8 % Xiaomi 12Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

% -100%OnePlus 10TAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

% -100%

Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø12.3 (8.84-16.7) Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø7.78 (6.63-11.8) Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø4.12 (4.09-4.14) Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø45.8 (33.4-62.9) Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø35.6 (27.5-59.4) Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø27.2 (23.6-41.9) OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø61.8 (59-63.6) Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø15.3 (15.3-15.3)

发言人在音频方面，Zenfone 9凭借良好的立体声扬声器、支持的多种蓝牙编解码器，包括LDAC、aptX HD和aptX自适应，以及包括高通Aqstic WCD9380 DAC的3.5毫米音频端口而脱颖而出。后者在我们的测试中显示出非常低的噪音水平（SNR：98.6 dBFS）。

两个扬声器产生的最大音量为88分贝，声音饱满。另一方面，中音和高音都可以变得稍微更线性。Zenfone 9的超高频也明显下降。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Asus Zenfone 9 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 70% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S22 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)Compared to same class» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 69% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 配备快速充电4.0的Zenfone 9消耗功率华硕智能手机的电池提供了4,300毫安时的容量，可以在大约85分钟内以30瓦的额定性能用快速充电技术进行充电。幸运的是，Zenfone 9附带有相应的充电器。另一方面，无线充电则是缺失的。

与一加10T的消耗量相比一加10T并考虑到明显较小的OLED面板，耗电量略高。特别是在Geekbench中，在调整亮度为150cd/m²时，华硕智能手机的耗电量相对较高。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby 0.08 / 0.37 WattIdle 1.01 / 1.1 / 1.17 Watt

Load

3.3 / 7.89 Watt

Key:

min: ,

med: ,

max: Metrahit Energy

Asus Zenfone 94300 mAhXiaomi 124500 mAhSamsung Galaxy S223700 mAhOnePlus 10T4800 mAhNothing Phone (1)4500 mAhAsus ZenFone 84000 mAhAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 Average of class Smartphone Power Consumption-27%-21%4%-11%1%-43%-39%Idle Minimum *1.010.87 14%0.69 32%0.8 21%1 1%0.82 19%1.006 ?(0.56 - 2.57, n=21) -0%0.873 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=158, last 2 years) 14%Idle Average *1.11.7 -55%1.19 -8%1.2 -9%1.2 -9%1.1 -0%1.834 ?(0.71 - 8.65, n=21) -67%1.41 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=158, last 2 years) -28%Idle Maximum *1.171.82 -56%1.26 -8%1.3 -11%1.5 -28%1.16 1%1.984 ?(0.79 - 8.71, n=21) -70%1.562 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=158, last 2 years) -34%Load Average *3.34.68 -42%6.97 -111%3.5 -6%4.2 -27%4.24 -28%5.68 ?(2.75 - 15, n=21) -72%7.01 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=149, last 2 years) -112%Load Maximum *7.897.41 6%8.85 -12%5.9 25%7.4 6%6.83 13%8.44 ?(4.54 - 15, n=21) -7%10.5 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=149, last 2 years) -33%* ... smaller is better

Poser Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1: Ø5.49 (1.232-9.94) OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1: Ø3.88 (0.779-7.97)

Poser Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.63 (8.51-8.94) OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.67 (7.25-10.7) Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.973 (0.905-1.632) OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.865 (0.73-1.198)

电池寿命在我们的实际电池测试中，在调整后的150cd/m²的显示亮度下运行，因此很容易进行比较，在120Hz的固定刷新率下，4300mAh的电池实现了良好的运行时间。在我们的WLAN测试中，Zenfone持续了近14个小时，而在停用WLAN模块的持续视频循环中，甚至有可能超过10小时。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)

28h 05min

WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 104)

13h 45min

Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p

23h 21min

Load (maximum brightness)

7h 42min

Asus Zenfone 94300 mAhXiaomi 124500 mAhSamsung Galaxy S223700 mAhOnePlus 10T4800 mAhNothing Phone (1)4500 mAhAsus ZenFone 84000 mAhBattery Runtime-2%-14%0%-12%-46%Reader / Idle16852558 52%2182 29%1795 7%1813 8%H.2641401890 -36%887 -37%1646 17%1059 -24%WiFi v1.3825760 -8%675 -18%856 4%926 12%442 -46%Load462385 -17%324 -30%332 -28%259 -44%

Pros+ 非常紧凑

+ 明亮的OLED面板

+ 良好的电池寿命

+ 良好的3.5毫米音频接口

+ 强大的SoC

+ 非常好的视频稳定功能Cons- 大量节流

- 只有USB2.0

- 弱光性能

- 边框相当厚

- 只有2年的更新

对华硕Zenfone 9的评判测试华硕Zenfone 9。测试装置由德国华硕公司提供凭借其紧凑的尺寸，禅风9 是今年最有趣的智能手机之一，也是那些喜欢小手机的人的首选。幸运的是，2022年的机型已经弥补了其前代产品的最大问题，即糟糕的电池寿命。

尽管它结构紧凑，但与那些明显较大的高端竞争对手相比，几乎没有任何妥协。特别是万向节技术使华硕的智能手机与众不同，也因为台湾制造商将这项技术与主摄像头相结合，在日常操作中提供了真正的额外价值。Zenfone 9的视频录制稳定性非常好，特别是在白天。这款小巧的智能手机在暗光条件下略显疲软，在摄影方面也是如此。

与前代产品相比，Zenfone 9是一个强大的升级。遗憾的是，华硕可能只会为其紧凑型智能手机提供两个大型Android 。

尽管体积小，但Zenfone 9不必放弃旗舰级SoC，即使没有相应的节流，它也会产生过多的热量，类似于小米12S Pro.那些希望能够不断使用全部功率的人骁龙8+ Gen1的人可以看看 ROG Phone 6 (Pro)具有主动冷却功能的兄弟姐妹机型。

除了三星Galaxy S22和小米12Android 的部分，另一个选择是 Apple iPhone 13 Mini.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性华硕Zenfone 9可从亚马逊无锁版，起价705美元。，例如。

Asus Zenfone 9

- 09/12/2022 v7 (old)

Marcus Herbrich

Chassis89%

Keyboard66 / 75 → 88%

Pointing Device94%

Connectivity53 / 70 → 76%

Weight91%

Battery91%

Display92%

Games Performance60 / 64 → 94%

Application Performance94 / 86 → 100%

Temperature93%

Noise100%

Audio74 / 90 → 83%

Camera76%

Average83%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 544 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 546569 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:

Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!